Start with the source
We prefer regulator publications and investigation records for regulatory and reporting explanations. We identify jurisdiction and link to the source. A primary source is useful because readers can inspect what it actually establishes.
Keep three statuses separate
- Documented
- A linked source supports a specific, bounded statement. That is not an endorsement of the whole aircraft.
- Claimed
- A statement needs its underlying evidence and scope checked before it can support a conclusion.
- Unresolved
- We lack enough information to reach a supported conclusion. Unknown does not mean safe or unsafe.
No numerical rating model
We have no validated comparative aircraft dataset, laboratory program or independent flight-test program. We publish no stars, aggregate scores, safest-model lists or accident-rate estimates. The checklist counts research tasks only.
Review and corrections
Sources for this launch were reviewed September 23, 2026. Next scheduled review: December 23, 2026, or sooner after a relevant change is identified. Design updates alone do not reset source-review dates. Send a specific correction and supporting source to [email protected].
Images and commercial independence
Illustrations are AI-generated concepts, not evidence. There are no paid aircraft placements, manufacturer partnerships or affiliate aircraft links on this publication at launch. Shared-ownership links are disclosed where used.